Every Radiologist Deserves an
AI Lung Cancer Screening 2nd Opinion.
In retrospective testing using held-out NLST data, LungAI's malignancy-risk model demonstrated improvements in AUROC, sensitivity, specificity and precision when evaluated alongside Lung-RADS v2022. LungAI has not been prospectively validated for clinical use.
Vision Transformer
Built from loss.
Driven by love.
Built to save lives.
Too many people, especially in underserved communities, are diagnosed with lung cancer too late. We built Oatmeal Health to change that.
I started Oatmeal Health for a simple reason. Cancer wasn't caught early in the people I loved, and it cost them their lives. I'm making sure others get caught in time.
From risk to care.
- Stage I survival 77 to 92% vs just 9% at Stage IV
- Higher sensitivity than Lung-RADS alone in retrospective testing
- Research objective: evaluate whether AI-assisted risk assessment can improve identification and risk stratification of suspicious pulmonary nodules and reduce the need for unnecessary biopsies
- Risk score appears inline, no new software, no extra clicks
- Read time drops from 5 to 10 min to 1.5 to 3 min
- 33 to 50% fewer unnecessary follow-up orders and biopsies (retrospective modeling; not established prospectively)
- Offer help with Biopsy vs wait decisions
- High-risk cases get priority appointment slots automatically
- May extend follow-up from 3 to 6 months, less radiation, fewer visits
- Every screen generates downstream referrals: biopsy, PET/CT, surgery, oncology, all staying in-system
- Positions the health system as a lung cancer center of excellence in the community
- HEDIS quality uplift, community benefit reporting, and Stage I detection rate improvement
- Stage I cost ~$200K vs Stage IV at ~$800K to $1.2M
- NCQA developing lung cancer screening HEDIS measure
- CPT 0721T pathway exists; LungAI billable only after FDA clearance
in your community?